<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The GEO-Jobe Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog</link>
	<description>The lighter side of GIS...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Interactive GIS Mapping Sites in TN by Analisa Pearle</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/01/22/interactive-mapping-sites-in-tn/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Analisa Pearle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/01/22/interactive-mapping-sites-in-tn/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>By far the most concise and up to date information I found on this topic. Sure glad that I navigated to your page by accident. I’ll be subscribing to your feed so that I can get the latest updates. Appreciate all the information here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By far the most concise and up to date information I found on this topic. Sure glad that I navigated to your page by accident. I’ll be subscribing to your feed so that I can get the latest updates. Appreciate all the information here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Winter Olympics Luge Aerial Images by Neill Jobe</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2010/02/18/2010-winter-olympics-luge-map/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Neill Jobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=1409#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ArcMap 9.3 Enhanced PDF Options by Neill Jobe</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/07/16/arcmap-93-enhanced-pdf-options/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Neill Jobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=288#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Brian,

The truncation may be a result of the format of the data. I know when converting data from GDB features classes to shapefiles, that field names are truncated down to 9 characters because it is a limitation of the dbf file. Same type of thing could be happening with whatever format the PDF file is using to store these attributes. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>The truncation may be a result of the format of the data. I know when converting data from GDB features classes to shapefiles, that field names are truncated down to 9 characters because it is a limitation of the dbf file. Same type of thing could be happening with whatever format the PDF file is using to store these attributes. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ArcMap 9.3 Enhanced PDF Options by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/07/16/arcmap-93-enhanced-pdf-options/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=288#comment-899</guid>
		<description>I had a truncation of feature attributes in Adobe Acrobat...not sure why.  Could be that the layer was a join (layer and table)?  My reason being is because the truncation occurred at the attribute I used to join the layer and table.  Still playing around with this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a truncation of feature attributes in Adobe Acrobat&#8230;not sure why.  Could be that the layer was a join (layer and table)?  My reason being is because the truncation occurred at the attribute I used to join the layer and table.  Still playing around with this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trimble Releases new GeoXH 2008 with real-time decimeter accuracy by Eric Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/05/19/trimble-releases-new-geoxh-2008-with-real-time-decimeter-accuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=219#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ArcMap 9.3 Enhanced PDF Options by Eric Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/07/16/arcmap-93-enhanced-pdf-options/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=288#comment-897</guid>
		<description>We aren&#039;t sure if there is a limit.  I haven&#039;t personally tried it, but everything I read leads me to believe that it should be unlimited...
Let us know if you find anything else!..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We aren&#8217;t sure if there is a limit.  I haven&#8217;t personally tried it, but everything I read leads me to believe that it should be unlimited&#8230;<br />
Let us know if you find anything else!..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trimble Releases new GeoXH 2008 with real-time decimeter accuracy by Internet Banking</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/05/19/trimble-releases-new-geoxh-2008-with-real-time-decimeter-accuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Banking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=219#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Just  blowing some time  on Digg  and I found your  article .  Not normally  what I  prefer to  learn about, but it was  definitely  worth my time. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just  blowing some time  on Digg  and I found your  article .  Not normally  what I  prefer to  learn about, but it was  definitely  worth my time. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ArcMap 9.3 Enhanced PDF Options by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/07/16/arcmap-93-enhanced-pdf-options/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=288#comment-877</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if there was a limit on how many attributes in one layer could be exported with the new export georeferenced PDF function.  28?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if there was a limit on how many attributes in one layer could be exported with the new export georeferenced PDF function.  28?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trimble Test Sites by New Post Processing Engine: Trimble® DeltaPhase™&#160;&#124;&#160;The GEO-Jobe Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2010/02/01/trimble-test-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>New Post Processing Engine: Trimble® DeltaPhase™&#160;&#124;&#160;The GEO-Jobe Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=1029#comment-873</guid>
		<description>[...] (green) postprocessing engine for the GeoXT handheld with the internal antenna from 26 points from Trimble&#8217;s Test Site 2 (suburban) environment.  The base station is within 10 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (green) postprocessing engine for the GeoXT handheld with the internal antenna from 26 points from Trimble&#8217;s Test Site 2 (suburban) environment.  The base station is within 10 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trimble Test Sites by Data Collection and Positioning Yield&#160;&#124;&#160;The GEO-Jobe Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2010/02/01/trimble-test-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Collection and Positioning Yield&#160;&#124;&#160;The GEO-Jobe Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=1029#comment-869</guid>
		<description>[...] yield potential is also greatly increased around environments such as Trimble&#8217;s Test Site 2 (typical) and Test Site 3 (extreme) where obstacles could effect postprocessed data accuracy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yield potential is also greatly increased around environments such as Trimble&#8217;s Test Site 2 (typical) and Test Site 3 (extreme) where obstacles could effect postprocessed data accuracy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
