<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Getting Sued over &#8220;Street View&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/</link>
	<description>The lighter side of GIS...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bull</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=197#comment-234</guid>
		<description>So it is ok for Google to invade privacy because you can search through all their data and report any problems yourself, and at their discretion they will remove it.  I’m sorry but personally I do not believe the public should have to prove all data posted by big companies is or isn’t invading privacy, the company should prove all data is legal before releasing it.  I’m used to my privacy being invaded and abused by my government, not happy of course, but private companies doing this is just not acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is ok for Google to invade privacy because you can search through all their data and report any problems yourself, and at their discretion they will remove it.  I’m sorry but personally I do not believe the public should have to prove all data posted by big companies is or isn’t invading privacy, the company should prove all data is legal before releasing it.  I’m used to my privacy being invaded and abused by my government, not happy of course, but private companies doing this is just not acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=197#comment-211</guid>
		<description>In response to Anonymous... Here is a link to a youtube video that shows you the steps to have an address removed.. Check it out.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4ZdgH5n3XI

Neill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Anonymous&#8230; Here is a link to a youtube video that shows you the steps to have an address removed.. Check it out.. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4ZdgH5n3XI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4ZdgH5n3XI</a></p>
<p>Neill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theron Hatch</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Theron Hatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=197#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I wonder if it started out based on the imagery only... until they realized that the County had similar imagery and in much better quality (many counties do this as part of property assessment services).  Then it may have morphed into the private property access thing and less about the imagery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it started out based on the imagery only&#8230; until they realized that the County had similar imagery and in much better quality (many counties do this as part of property assessment services).  Then it may have morphed into the private property access thing and less about the imagery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=197#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I really hope that this couple wins this lawsuit against Google. I don&#039;t like the fact that anyone can view your home, street, etc..etc.. I wish there was a place where you could submmit your information for your address to dissapear from the web site. Or also to complaint about it. If anyone knows how we can remove our info please post it. Thanks. L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that this couple wins this lawsuit against Google. I don&#8217;t like the fact that anyone can view your home, street, etc..etc.. I wish there was a place where you could submmit your information for your address to dissapear from the web site. Or also to complaint about it. If anyone knows how we can remove our info please post it. Thanks. L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArcDigita</title>
		<link>http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/2008/04/04/google-getting-sued-over-street-view/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>ArcDigita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geo-jobe.com/blog/?p=197#comment-206</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the couple really understands how many legal definitions of &quot;private roads&quot; are out there.  Unless the Google Van broke through a physical barrier to obtain the images, I do not think the private couple will win any case against Google on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the couple really understands how many legal definitions of &#8220;private roads&#8221; are out there.  Unless the Google Van broke through a physical barrier to obtain the images, I do not think the private couple will win any case against Google on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
